2
When uptime-kuma is offline and back online, the status report lead to wrong assertions to services status
Source: louislam/uptime-kuma#5710 · opened by @Fade78
📑 I have found these related issues/pull requests It's very hard to formulate but I didn't find any issues about "offline" or "take into account". 🛡️ Security Policy • I agree to have read this project [Security Policy]( Description I have a host with many VMs with services and also the uptime-kuma instance. Sometimes, I power the entire host off. When it's back online, the open-kuma instance reports one little red bar and all the other are green. At a glance, I could say there was a little downtime while in fact it was for hours. ![Image]( _What is displayed by uptime-kuma._ • The red bar is dated: 2025-03-19 06:07 • The green bar just at its right is dated: 2025-03-18 06:12, as expected • The green bar just at its left is dated: 2025-03-18 22:00, which is 8H before Looking at this bar you can say that nothing happened, maybe a little interruption. But in fact it was a entire night off. The actual truth should be the…
No pledges yet. Be the first to back this.
Comments
Similar requests
When uptime kuma is down, tracking time is skipped
0 votes · 0 comments
Passive / informational monitor state
0 votes · 0 comments
Status Page: Sort offline monitors at the top of the status page in 'offline' group
10 votes · 0 comments
Customisability of the message "uptimekuma" in alerta notifications
1 vote · 0 comments
Show only online or offline but no %
7 votes · 0 comments
No comments yet.