5
How can we get close to the server deployment?
Source: supabase/supabase#3795 · opened by @fergusmeiklejohn
I don't think Supabase should go for a firebase hosting type solution, but it is a pain point that my server deploy is difficult to get close to my database. Ideally they'd be on the same internal network. Like the way fly.io do it. I don't want to eject I want to pay for Supabase but I do feel the pain of getting my server deploy and DB deploy together.
I just wanted to put this out there, not sure what can be done. For me, the ideal solution would be a number of deploy options, like Fly, AWS, CloudFlare, Vercel, where I could choose the best server/db deploy option for my app. It's a problem that needs a business level solution I guess?
I just wanted to put this out there, not sure what can be done. For me, the ideal solution would be a number of deploy options, like Fly, AWS, CloudFlare, Vercel, where I could choose the best server/db deploy option for my app. It's a problem that needs a business level solution I guess?
No pledges yet. Be the first to back this.
Comments
Similar requests
Can Wasm FDW be used with Supabase cloud?
1 vote · 0 comments
Optionally store self-hosted Edge Functions in S3
1 vote · 0 comments
Move docker directory to it's own repository
4 votes · 0 comments
Frontend Hosting on Supabase Cloud
2 votes · 0 comments
Edge Functions Rollback / Versioning Support Inquiry
2 votes · 0 comments
No comments yet.