Implemented
0
feat(signals): report research agent reads steering notes and fleet memory
Source: PostHog/posthog#91267 · opened by @andrewm4894
What The signals report research agent — the sandbox-backed multi-turn stage that produces a report's findings, priority, actionability, title, summary, and suggested reviewers — should read the team's steering notes and the scout fleet's shared scratchpad before judging, and record which notes it applied. Today it reads no user preference at all. Meanwhile the inbox already converts user feedback into steering notes via three derived origins — report_dismissal, report_discussion, report_feedback (see products/signals/backend/scout_harness/tools/notes.py plus dismissal_notes.py, discussion_notes.py, feedback_notes.py) — that only scheduled scout runs ever read. Reading them at the research stage closes the steering loop users feel most: "I dismissed a report with a reason, and the next report respected it." It works for every signal source at once, because every source funnels through report generation. Why this is (almost) prompt-only • The scout me…
No pledges yet. Be the first to back this.
Comments
Similar requests
feat(signals): pipeline audience targets for steering notes
0 votes · 0 comments
feat(signals): report research steering eval suite
0 votes · 0 comments
feat(tasks): implementation runs read steering notes and fleet memory
0 votes · 0 comments
feat(signals): report research agent remembers judgments in the fleet scratchpad
0 votes · 0 comments
feat(signals): comment on the source GitHub issue when an inbox report starts tracking it
0 votes · 0 comments
No comments yet.