2
[Feature] Identification of "Group" photos and limited tagging.
Source: immich-app/immich#6450 · opened by @ns-mglaske
The feature
I have quite a few photos that are at music festivals, or of kids events, which are pictures of many people, most of which end up filling up the people face match list for those photos. My suggestion is, to identify photos as "Group" photos, where face matches are greater than N, and optionally for those photos, only show the already identified faces. And possibly a config option to ignore the extra faces to limit the Face Match library.
This might also need an option on the photo to queue for full re-scan if someone wants to identify the extra faces, or possibly a toggle in the photo info to show only matched or all.
Platform
• Server
• Web
• Mobile
I have quite a few photos that are at music festivals, or of kids events, which are pictures of many people, most of which end up filling up the people face match list for those photos. My suggestion is, to identify photos as "Group" photos, where face matches are greater than N, and optionally for those photos, only show the already identified faces. And possibly a config option to ignore the extra faces to limit the Face Match library.
This might also need an option on the photo to queue for full re-scan if someone wants to identify the extra faces, or possibly a toggle in the photo info to show only matched or all.
Platform
• Server
• Web
• Mobile
No pledges yet. Be the first to back this.
Comments
Similar requests
[Feature] remove confirmation dialog when tagging a face
8 votes · 0 comments
Images that are both in my library and in an iOS shared album appear as duplicate in Immich
5 votes · 0 comments
[Feature] Allow browsing local (non-backed-up) photos in timeline alongside backed-up photos + Filter Photos Page Album
4 votes · 0 comments
[Feature] Sync with Apple MacOS Photos
10 votes · 0 comments
[Feature] Immich search should clear the photo selection after adding it to an album when using the "Not in any album" display option
2 votes · 0 comments
No comments yet.