3
Relational field (M2M) as Dropdown in Admin UI Filters.
Source: directus/directus#24306 · opened by @hsaifurrehman
Summary Currently, when dealing with a User table and a Subscription table connected via a many-to-many (M2M) relational field, filtering users based on their subscriptions requires navigating to subscriptions->name and manually entering the name of the subscription using the contains or equals operation. While functional, this approach is not user-friendly and can lead to errors, especially with inconsistent naming or large datasets. Current Behavior: 1. Navigate to the filter settings in the User table. 2. Select subscriptions->name as the field to filter. 3. Choose a filter operation (contains, equals, etc.). 4. Manually type the subscription name to apply the filter. Problem with the Current Implementation: 1. It relies on exact, manual text input, which is prone to typos or mismatched naming conventions. 2. It does not leverage the relational field for a dynamic and user-friendly experience. 3. For larger datasets, manually typing subscription names become…
No pledges yet. Be the first to back this.
Comments
Similar requests
Allow disabling editing of a M2M linked item
5 votes · 0 comments
M2M relationship in both objects
2 votes · 0 comments
`sort` field is visible after creating a M2M field
1 vote · 0 comments
m2m: option to hide relational item in drawer
12 votes · 0 comments
Search in relational/display fields
94 votes · 0 comments
No comments yet.